This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Davies, P. Articles by Coates, G. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Competing Conceptions and Values in School Strategy

Rational Planning and Beyond

Institute for Education Policy Research, Staffordshire University, Leek Road, Stoke-on-Trent ST4 2DF, UK. p.i.davies{at}staffs.ac.uk

Gwen Coates

Staffordshire University

Government policy in England has encouraged schools to adopt a rational planning model on the basis that this will contribute to school effectiveness. This policy has been criticized for neglecting the consequences for the planning process of volatility in schools’ external environment and for replacing well-developed professional knowledge and commitment with inappropriate models from ‘for-profit’ business. We agree that the rational planning model is not an appropriate basis for school management but dispute these diagnoses of the nature of the problem. We suggest that it is uncertainty about processes internal to the school that are the problem and that an appropriate managerial response to this problem can draw upon business ideas which are not oppositional to professional expertise and values, while questioning professional self-interest.

Key Words: managerialism • planning • professional development • uncertainty • volatility

Educational Management Administration & Leadership, Vol. 33, No. 1, 109-124 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1741143205048177


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?