Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational Management Administration & Leadership
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Webb, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Leading Teaching and Learning in the Primary School

From ‘Educative Leadership’ to ‘Pedagogical Leadership’

Rosemary Webb

Department of Educational Studies, University of York, Heslington,York YO10 5DD, UK.rew7{at}york.ac.uk

Case study data from six primary schools are drawn upon to examine the reality of primary headteacher leadership. Three alternative theoretical models of leadership are used to analyse the ways in which it has changed since the Education Reform Act (1988) and the implications of these changes for leading teaching and learning. Prior to 1988 primary headteachers as ‘educative leaders’ were involved in teaching and direct working relations with children and classteachers. However, in the current educational climate ‘educative leadership’ appears unsustainable. Although ‘instructional leadership’ is an effective model for achieving compliance with government reforms and achieving a narrow standards agenda, it stifles teachers’ creativity and constrains school innovation. It is argued that ‘pedagogical leadership’, as exemplified by two headteachers in the study, appears to offer much greater possibilities for developing teaching and promoting both pupil and teacher learning. While the practice of ‘pedagogical leadership’ is viewed as conflicting with aspects of ‘instructional leadership’, it has value congruence with ‘educative leadership’ and can therefore develop from it.

Key Words: elementary schools • leaders • management • pedagogy • principals

Educational Management Administration & Leadership, Vol. 33, No. 1, 69-91 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1741143205048175


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Educational Management Administration LeadershipHome page
B. Grummell, D. Devine, and K. Lynch
Appointing Senior Managers in Education: Homosociability, Local Logics and Authenticity in the Selection Process
Educational Management Administration Leadership, May 1, 2009; 37(3): 329 - 349.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational Management Administration LeadershipHome page
N. O. Pansiri
Instructional Leadership for Quality Learning: An Assessment of the Impact of the Primary School Management Development Project in Botswana
Educational Management Administration Leadership, October 1, 2008; 36(4): 471 - 494.
[Abstract] [PDF]