Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational Management Administration & Leadership
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heck, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Hallinger, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Study of Educational Leadership and Management

Where Does the Field Stand Today?

Ronald H. Heck

University of Hawaii at Manoa, rheck{at}hawaii.edu

Philip Hallinger

College of Management, Mahidol University, Bangkok

This article comments on the state of research in educational leadership and management as a field of study between 1990 and the present. We discuss the role of research reviews and compendia in the field as a means of identifying past trends, current dilemmas, and future directions for scholarship. We conclude five major points. First, today there is less agreement about the significant problems that scholars should address than in past years. Second, scholarly directions seem to be changing, as an increasing number of scholars are approaching educational leadership and management as a humanistic and moral endeavor rather than a scientific one. Third, although there are more diverse and robust methodological tools available for inquiry, programs of sustained empirical research are few in number. Fourth, a reluctance to evaluate the worth of contrasting conceptual and methodological approaches according to an accepted set of scholarly criteria leaves researchers, policy-makers and practitioners to fall back upon individual judgments of what is useful and valid knowledge. Finally, a lack of empirical rigor in the field continues to impact the development of a future generation of researchers.

Key Words: educational administration scholarship • headteachers • principals • research on principals • school leaders

Educational Management Administration & Leadership, Vol. 33, No. 2, 229-244 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1741143205051055


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am Educ Res JHome page
R. H. Heck and P. Hallinger
Assessing the Contribution of Distributed Leadership to School Improvement and Growth in Math Achievement
American Educational Research Journal, September 1, 2009; 46(3): 659 - 689.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Educational Management Administration LeadershipHome page
A. Trnavcevic and S. Roncelli Vaupot
Exploring Aspiring Principals' Perceptions of Principalship: A Slovenian Case Study
Educational Management Administration Leadership, January 1, 2009; 37(1): 85 - 105.
[Abstract] [PDF]